See here, why break N is a bad idea.
The same applies to %%
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3568r0.html
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Gesendet: Sa 23.05.2026 10:23
Betreff: Re: [std-proposals] return value lives until end of scope
An: std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org;
CC: Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com>;
On Saturday, May 23, 2026, Sebastian Wittmeier wrote:
You can use a single variable (container for futures) and use it as reference parameter to a function creating your async call.
I think the following:int main(){for ( unsigned i = 0u; i < N; ++i ){%%async(Func);}}would have to be implemented by the compiler something like:int main(){struct Frame {alignas(std::future<int>) char unsigned f[ sizeof(std::future<int>) ];Frame *next;};Frame fr;Frame *p = &fr;for ( unsigned i = 0u; i < N; ++i ){::new(p->f) std::future<int>{ async(Func) };p->next = alloca( sizeof *p );p->next.next = nullptr;p = p->next;}for ( p = &fr; nullptr != p; p = p->next ){((std::future<int>*)p->f)->~std::future<int>();}-- Std-Proposals mailing list Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals