I will not talk about JIT, but I will cite the possibility that JIT's can be used. It is just to keep my name in history as one of the men who thought JIT is the future.

Infact I will call JIT the most radical but possible solution.

Many Thanks for your input !

Regards, Muneem

On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 11:08 AM Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

On Tuesday, 31 March 2026 22:54:10 Pacific Daylight Time Muneem via Std-
Proposals wrote:
> The point is that current polymorphism can be
> amplified if we provide a JIT that makes current polymorphism less verbose
> with the same performance.

We cannot provide a JIT.

I mean, it could be done, but I expect it to take 10 years of drafting papers
and a lot of effort discussing with vendors and stakeholders. Short of someone
investing that much amount of time, with incredibly potent arguments, JIT is
not going happen. Do not talk about JIT in your proposals.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals