On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 12:00 PM Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 3:56 PM Brian Bi wrote:
>
> There is no need to submit another issue about "some people think that
> relocatable means memcpyable". We already have national body comments
> about that, which will be considered in Kona. In Kona there probably won't be
> any time to consider any issues that are not national body comments.

Are you telling me that I must ask the head of the British panel to
put this forward for the Kona meeting next Wednesday?

No. It's too late to submit additional national body comments. You can find the list here: https://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/n5028.pdf

You should read the list of comments to see whether your proposal is responsive to the concerns and proposed resolutions contained therein. Proposals that do not help increase the level of consensus among national bodies will be deferred until work starts on C++29 (at which point they're likely to be rejected if they say "please rip out this feature that was added in the previous language version and replace it with something totally different").

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

Brian Bi