Proposal for `std::construct` Function Object

I. Motivation

C++ users can convert member functions to funtion objects with std::mem_fn(), partially bind arguments to functions or function objects with std::bind, std::bind_front(), and std::bind_back(), type-erase them with std::function<>, and use them to transform ranges with std::views::transform. But none of that can be done directly to class constructors; a helper function must be used to "downgrade" the constructor into a function.

The proposed std::construct<> is a utility function object that provides a convenient, generic mechanism to convert a constructor overload set into a function object, thereby allowing all the existing tooling for function objects to be brought to bear on it.

II. Example Problem

Imagine you have a range of size_t and you wish to return a vector of vectors, with the sizes given from the given range. Naive code can look like:

    std::vector<std::vector<int>> result;
    result.reserve(std::distance(input));
    for (auto sz : input) {
         result.emplace_back(sz);
    }

However, this is unsatisfying. The input range may be an input_range, which does not afford two passes (one for std::distance, one for the for loop). The emplace_back loop is less efficient than constructing the vector from a range.

A modern range-based solution would look like

   auto result = input
       | std::views::transform([] (size_t sz) {
           return std::vector<int>(sz);
       }
       | std::ranges::to<std::vector>();

This is still unsatisfying, as the lambda is not concise.

III. Proposed Solution: `std::construct`

A. Function Signature

std::construct<T> evaluates to a function object that perfectly forwards its arguments to T's constructors.

namespace std {

    template <typename T>
    inline constexpr auto construct = [] <typename... Args> (Args&&... args) -> T
    {
        return T(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
    };
}

B. Semantics

Constructs an object of type T using perfect forwarding
Supports any constructor of T
Returns the constructed object by value
Works with both trivial and complex types
constexpr-compatible
if T is a reference type and std::construct attempts to bind its return value to a temporary, the program is ill formed

IV. Example Usage

    // Basic usage
    auto str = std::construct<std::string>("Hello");

    // Complex type construction
    struct Complex {
        int x, y;
        Complex(int a, int b) : x(a), y(b) {}
    };
    auto comp = std::construct<Complex>(10, 20);

    // Composability with std::bind_front
    auto make_imag = std::bind_front(std::construct<Complex>, 0);
    auto sqrt_minus_one = make_imag(1);

    // Updated example from above
    auto result = input
        | std::views::transform(std::construct<std::vector<int>>)
        | std::ranges::to<std::vector>();

V. Design Considerations

Advantages

Type-safe
No memory allocation overhead
Works with any constructible type
Composable with the rest of the functional library

Potential Concerns

Might be seen as redundant with P3312

Naming

std::construct() is seen as consistent with std::construct_at().

Other alternatives:

std::make_obj_using_allocator() is similar. Perhaps std::make_obj<T>() or std::make_object<T>() would work.
std::make_from_tuple() is also similar. So perhaps std::make<T>(...)?!

VI. Implementation

Reference implementation:

    template <typename T>
    inline constexpr auto construct = [] <typename... Args> (Args&&... args) -> T
    {
        return T(std::forward<Args>(args)...);
    };

VII. Wording

TBD

VIII. Complexity

Time Complexity: O(1) construction time
Space Complexity: No additional space overhead

IX. Proposed Standardization

Recommend inclusion in the <functional> header in a future C++ standard revision.

X. Acknowledgments

Thanks to Arthur O'Dwyer for correcting an ealier version on the mailing list, and to Claude with assistance on this draft.

Proposal for std::construct Function Object