If you want to add a hype topic:

One current issue is AI generated or AI supported code and its lack of stability for multiple AI passes.

A LLM could refactor everything in a project wrongly for an actual one-line change.

It could lose the requirements and the tested code and the design decisions.

Structured source code comments could help with those issues a bit.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jan Schultke via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Gesendet: Fr 21.03.2025 08:00
Betreff: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
An: C++ Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>;
CC: Jan Schultke <janschultke@googlemail.com>;
Has there been any attempt to standardize doc comments for C++,
similar to Javadoc
(https://download.java.net/java/early_access/loom/docs/specs/javadoc/doc-comment-spec.html)?

Doxygen-style comments have been existing practice for a long time,
and many tools support them to some extent. I could improve UX if we
had a standard syntax and a set of standard tags for such comments.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals