I have to admit I just glanced over the proposal.

You have not mentioned, what disadvantage having both a fundamental and a library type have?
 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jan Schultke via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Gesendet: Fr 14.03.2025 07:11
Betreff: Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
An: std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org;
CC: Jan Schultke <janschultke@googlemail.com>;
> 128-bit integer type? Yes, should be coming with C's _BitInt(N).

I'm taking the first steps towards getting that into C++ btw.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P3639R0.html

I've also made a proposal for 128-bit integers before, but I think
it's just not high-consensus enough and I at least want to test the
waters for _BitInt first.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals