Because I don't want it to be both.

And although people can speak passionately about either or not goto is good. The point is it's irrelevant to the feature being proposed.

And trying to force them together is not doing it any favors.



From: Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces@lists.isocpp.org> on behalf of Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 6:24:33 PM
To: std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org>
Cc: Thiago Macieira <thiago@macieira.org>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Bringing break/continue with label to C++

On Thursday 19 December 2024 04:18:20 Brasilia Standard Time Tiago Freire via
Std-Proposals wrote:
> name:
>
> for()
> {}
> `
>
> Now, did I mean name the "for" or create a "goto label"?


Why can't it be both?

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering



--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals