First I have to apologize, I misunderstood the feature... You mean that you want to have something like the getter/setter decorators used in Python?

Secondary, the ref thing is broken because it would be wrong or even dangling reference the moment Foo is copied/moved.

// Robin


On Mon, Dec 16, 2024, 11:11 Oskars Putans via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
What if you used

class Foo {
private:
  int value;
public:
  const int& readOnlyValue = value;
};

as a way of exposing a const version?

It might not work in all use cases as it does remove std::is_trivially_assignable trait from
the class, but this gets rid of an explicit getter and reduces boilerplate. If you want to support assignment, you need to write your own overloads. This method is slightly shady, however, as other developers might make
the assumption that this value won't change. I would rather use getters for this, but this is one alternative you can consider. Realistically, as a proposal to core cpp, there's a very low likelihood that this would make the cut. 
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals