Of course we are. Yours is a proposal to change C++, so you need to explain
how the new content will insert into the existing structure and not break
anything that is already working. You must propose a delta to the current
status.

Ok, fair enough 
My proposal is trying to keep all information available about types, concerning only 3 categories of objects.
-Arrays
-Functions templates
-Variable templates 
To achieve that we need a tool, in form of an operator, to record that lost information otherwise.
This operator behaves exactly like its current counterparts so it will not break any existing code.
But when used in some well defined manner it will trigger the compiler to do some type manipulation.

"Pretend it works somehow" does not make sense. It has to work without
pretending. And you have to explain how it will work, with detailed rules.

Otherwise, we could have a pretend standard and a pretend compiler.

I have detailed the greatest part of the necessary rules.
I cannot find all the obscure corner cases in one sitting,  otherwise i don't need to discuss it in threads.

And pretending that something works is a logical way to find errors.
1- assume A is correct
2- Use it 
3- if it give contradiction result,  then your assumption is wrong 
4- correct it
5- then repeat from 1.

That's how usually we build softwares.