Your objection to "reflexpr" sounds good to me. ("reflectof" sounds about right, by analogy to "alignof" — neither one is grammatical, but they're ungrammatical in analogous ways.)
I'm not qualified to comment on the second part. It sounds like the situation is a mess before your change, but also still quite a bit of a mess after your change.
I do think you should clarify whether you are proposing that e.g. `reify_v` be a synonym for `reify_value`, or if you're just proposing multiple mutually-exclusive alternatives for discussion. If you are proposing mutually-exclusive alternatives, you should express a clear preference for one over the others, with rationale.

–Arthur


On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:43 AM Gašper Ažman via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
s/donate/denote/g

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:17 AM Михаил Найденов via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
Hello, 
I have written a formal proposal for alternative naming of the Reflection API, based on a previous reddit discussion 
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals