It can't break the standards because you're adding a new syntax, you're not replacing one or hijacking the template token types.

For the rest maybe I can help but you seem to be more aware of the latest standards than I am.

Also IMO this is really important in order to keep the standards as clean and simple as possible.

I'd be willing to write a proposal but it would be a lot of work, so I'm curious whether people think this would be something good to have in addition to P0847, before I go ahead and write it up.

On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 12:19 AM Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals <std-proposals@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:

Are we moving forward with the syntax Brian suggested? It seems good to me...

On 10/4/19 11:31 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:

But Brian came up with a better syntax.

--

Phil Bouchard
Founder
C.: (819) 328-4743

--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

--

Brian Bi

--

Phil Bouchard
Founder
C.: (819) 328-4743