On 8/19/26 05:37, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 at 05:54, Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> If P2900 is staying, can you define (= propose) a 5th mode that acts like compile_assert and also hope that the implementations give better error messages and locations than an undefined violation handler?
>
> I don't know about others, but yes, yes I can: https://godbolt.org/z/xPz8hjcYY

While this is all great experimentation, I'd like to point out that we'd
need an actual specification of what this new thing should do, instead of
"whatever the optimizer can deduce in today's version of my implementation".

Jens