On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 10:57, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Oh and just as an aside . . . I personally have never used
> 'std::unexpected'. Of course there are really suitable uses for it,
> but personally I'm fine with having one 'bad value' or 'absent value'
> or 'unused value' among the data. If I had 3 or 4 or 5 bad values then
> yeah maybe I'd go for 'std::unexpected' -- but for the vast majority
> of problems it's just overkill.

A description fit for the idea being discussed here, too.