Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 15:48:03 -0300
On Sunday, 11 January 2026 15:07:40 Brasilia Standard Time Sebastian Wittmeier
via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Lifetime has already started, if it is in shared memory or files?
>
> Yes and no. The process had no notion of objects being represented there.
I am arguing that "the process" should have an expanded view comprising the
previous process which started the lifetime of those objects. They are like
threads, only the VM space is not entirely shared. The fact that the address
space may be different and that there may have been no overlapping time in
which the two processes had this segment of memory mapped should be completely
irrelevant.
via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Lifetime has already started, if it is in shared memory or files?
>
> Yes and no. The process had no notion of objects being represented there.
I am arguing that "the process" should have an expanded view comprising the
previous process which started the lifetime of those objects. They are like
threads, only the VM space is not entirely shared. The fact that the address
space may be different and that there may have been no overlapping time in
which the two processes had this segment of memory mapped should be completely
irrelevant.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
Received on 2026-01-11 18:48:16
