Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:14:29 +0000
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 4:03 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> Dead on arrival. It's impossible to implement that lock-free in all
> architectures, so it'll never be added to the Standard.
Oh yes I can see so clearly now . . . that's why std::uintptr_t was
rejected and never made its way into the Standard.
Wait.... what? You mean some stuff _can_ be optional depending on the
target? Really?
>
> Dead on arrival. It's impossible to implement that lock-free in all
> architectures, so it'll never be added to the Standard.
Oh yes I can see so clearly now . . . that's why std::uintptr_t was
rejected and never made its way into the Standard.
Wait.... what? You mean some stuff _can_ be optional depending on the
target? Really?
Received on 2026-01-09 17:14:43