> Example with 30 shared_timed_mutexes -> 30 shared_locks -> 1
> unique_multilock (which makes the unique_multilock a
> _SharedTimedLockable_ itself):

Sorry, that will make it a _TimedLockable_ itself. / Ted

> 2025-09-08 18:58, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals:
>> Can I use it with std::shared_lock?
>
> Yes, it's meant to be everything a unique_lock is but for zero-to-many
> lockables. I think using a `std::shared_mutex`/`std::shared_timed_mutex`
> rather than a `std::shared_lock` with it will be more common, but sure,
> you can stack them.
>
> Example with 30 shared_timed_mutexes -> 30 shared_locks -> 1
> unique_multilock (which makes the unique_multilock a
> _SharedTimedLockable_ itself):
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/nGjv8W3Yc
>
> 30 is probably an extreme use case but I like to check that compilation
> times are reasonable for the example implementation.
>
> Br,
> Ted
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> on
>> behalf of Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals <std-
>> proposals_at_[hidden]>
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 8, 2025 6:12:06 PM
>> *To:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
>> *Cc:* Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] P3833R0a - std::unique_multilock
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 19:06, Ted Lyngmo via Std-Proposals
>> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> > 2025-09-08 10:51, Jonathan Wakely:
>> > > > If anyone has an idea, please share!
>> > >
>> > > unique_lock_n seems fairly easy to guess what it does from the name.
>> > >
>> > > Although I suppose all the existing xxx_n names in the library
>> have an
>> > > 'n' parameter that tells you the length, whereas here it's
>> implied by
>> > > the number of template arguments.
>> > Yes, but it may be better to have `unique_lock` first in the name like
>> > in unique_lock_n. Perhaps spelling it out to not make people think _n
>> > means a numeric argment would be good:
>> >
>> > unique_lock_many
>> > unique_lock_multi
>> >
>> > ... or some version of that? / Ted
>>
>> I find unique_multilock a perfectly good name.
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals <https://
>> lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals>
>>
>>
>