Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:49:20 +0100
I came across this paper just now by Nevin Liber:
"We shouldn't rush to require either CHAR_BIT==8 or (u)intNN_t"
which is a rebuttal to the following paper by JF Bastien:
p3477r3 - There are exactly 8 bit in a byte
I want to add the point that I program microscopes 5 days a week that
have a Texas Instruments microcontroller inside them that has CHAR_BIT
== 16.
There are compilers alive and kicking today, getting used to produce
saleable products, that have CHAR_BIT
"We shouldn't rush to require either CHAR_BIT==8 or (u)intNN_t"
which is a rebuttal to the following paper by JF Bastien:
p3477r3 - There are exactly 8 bit in a byte
I want to add the point that I program microscopes 5 days a week that
have a Texas Instruments microcontroller inside them that has CHAR_BIT
== 16.
There are compilers alive and kicking today, getting used to produce
saleable products, that have CHAR_BIT
Received on 2025-06-30 10:49:31