Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:23:20 +0100
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 8:53 AM Arthur O'Dwyer wrote:
> However, the thing in this thread is yet again different:
> it's kind of like `is_trivially_const_referenceable_as<T, U>`.
The only thing that could get in the way is mutable members. Which is
why I think we should have:
std::has_mutable_members_v<T>
> However, the thing in this thread is yet again different:
> it's kind of like `is_trivially_const_referenceable_as<T, U>`.
The only thing that could get in the way is mutable members. Which is
why I think we should have:
std::has_mutable_members_v<T>
Received on 2025-06-17 13:23:32