Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:04:14 +0300
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 11:47, Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On 10 Jun 2025 01:58, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 01:31, Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals
> > <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> I realize that the Standard Committee resources are limited, but I also
> >> don't find this argument convincing. You could argue the same way e.g.
> >> about coroutines or any other niche feature of the language, which was
> >> arguably more expensive to standardize and implement, yet here we are.
> >
> > I don't quite follow this analogy. I can't just write something else
> > instead of coroutines
>
> You could use ucontext or at the very least setjmp/longjmp.
The plausibility of the suggested analogy is getting weaker.
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On 10 Jun 2025 01:58, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 01:31, Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals
> > <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> I realize that the Standard Committee resources are limited, but I also
> >> don't find this argument convincing. You could argue the same way e.g.
> >> about coroutines or any other niche feature of the language, which was
> >> arguably more expensive to standardize and implement, yet here we are.
> >
> > I don't quite follow this analogy. I can't just write something else
> > instead of coroutines
>
> You could use ucontext or at the very least setjmp/longjmp.
The plausibility of the suggested analogy is getting weaker.
Received on 2025-06-10 10:04:28