Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:19:38 -0500
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 2:17 PM Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Monday, 9 June 2025 15:55:32 Brasilia Standard Time René Ferdinand
> Rivera
> Morell via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > > I find this interesting... but not surprising.
> >
> > It would be more useful to provide the feedback with less sarcasm and
> > abrasion. Just say what the paper is missing, why it's badly structured,
> > and if you feel like it and provide pointers and direction as to getting
> > help improving it. We've been new at writing papers at some point.
> >
> >
> > PS. Yes, I'm aware of that other thread regarding this paper. And that
> > context still doesn't justify the insuations here.
>
> Several people told Frederick, repeatedly, that he was coming up with a
> solution in search of a problem, that he had not yet explained the
> motivation
> for doing what he was doing, that the implementation details were mostly
> irrelevant. And yet he proceeded to write a paper that had all the flaws
> that
> had been pointed out.
>
> Plus, this is a pattern of behaviour. That's why Arthur said it's not
> surprising.
>
> PS. Yes, I'm aware of that other thread regarding this paper. And that
> context still doesn't justify the insuations here
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Monday, 9 June 2025 15:55:32 Brasilia Standard Time René Ferdinand
> Rivera
> Morell via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > > I find this interesting... but not surprising.
> >
> > It would be more useful to provide the feedback with less sarcasm and
> > abrasion. Just say what the paper is missing, why it's badly structured,
> > and if you feel like it and provide pointers and direction as to getting
> > help improving it. We've been new at writing papers at some point.
> >
> >
> > PS. Yes, I'm aware of that other thread regarding this paper. And that
> > context still doesn't justify the insuations here.
>
> Several people told Frederick, repeatedly, that he was coming up with a
> solution in search of a problem, that he had not yet explained the
> motivation
> for doing what he was doing, that the implementation details were mostly
> irrelevant. And yet he proceeded to write a paper that had all the flaws
> that
> had been pointed out.
>
> Plus, this is a pattern of behaviour. That's why Arthur said it's not
> surprising.
>
> PS. Yes, I'm aware of that other thread regarding this paper. And that
> context still doesn't justify the insuations here
-- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Received on 2025-06-09 19:19:52