Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 18:16:15 -0500
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 4:56 PM Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 1 June 2025 23:52:34 Brasilia Standard Time Oliver Hunt wrote:
> > By definition the *platform* defines the C++ ABI.
>
> Again, no. By convention, it does not and never has, not in the 30 years
> C++
> compilers have existed. No OS officially endorses such a document.
True. Except I remember one OS did "specify" a C++ ABI.. BeOS. Which
produced all kinds of "fun" developer experiences. ;-)
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 1 June 2025 23:52:34 Brasilia Standard Time Oliver Hunt wrote:
> > By definition the *platform* defines the C++ ABI.
>
> Again, no. By convention, it does not and never has, not in the 30 years
> C++
> compilers have existed. No OS officially endorses such a document.
True. Except I remember one OS did "specify" a C++ ABI.. BeOS. Which
produced all kinds of "fun" developer experiences. ;-)
-- -- René Ferdinand Rivera Morell -- Don't Assume Anything -- No Supongas Nada -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Received on 2025-06-02 23:16:33