Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 19:21:26 +0300
On 27 Apr 2025 17:21, Jonathan Wakely via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2025, 14:51 Julian Waters via Std-Proposals, <std-
> proposals_at_[hidden] <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> I do agree noexcept has gotten a bit problematic, though I have no
> opinion on the proposal presented here. I do want to grab this
> opportunity to say that I find it pretty ridiculous that to reap the
> benefits of noexcept I have to mark the entire call chain all the way
> down noexcept though.
>
> Or stop using it unnecessarily everywhere, so the code doesn't need
> handlers in every function.
At the point where you suggest that one should not use C APIs, you make
C++ irrelevant for any real world usage. Note that C APIs are not
limited to just libc.
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2025, 14:51 Julian Waters via Std-Proposals, <std-
> proposals_at_[hidden] <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> I do agree noexcept has gotten a bit problematic, though I have no
> opinion on the proposal presented here. I do want to grab this
> opportunity to say that I find it pretty ridiculous that to reap the
> benefits of noexcept I have to mark the entire call chain all the way
> down noexcept though.
>
> Or stop using it unnecessarily everywhere, so the code doesn't need
> handlers in every function.
At the point where you suggest that one should not use C APIs, you make
C++ irrelevant for any real world usage. Note that C APIs are not
limited to just libc.
Received on 2025-04-27 16:21:30