Here's some feedback:
- The formatting of in-line code is currently hard to read on some monitors
- "this particular one lacks the support" you're talking about two
functions so this should be plural
- Same with "wide string compliant functions for it."
- "std::wprint and std::wprintln namely." is a sentence fragment
- The motivation is lacking, this is going to be a fair bit of work for
library maintainers so it needs justification
- The "New Functionality" section doesn't really serve a purpose currently
- In the "Implementation Experience" section you mention "ECPPS," which
does not appear to exist other than someone's ECS library. Is this a
ChatGPT hallucination?
- The examples appendix mentions multiple "examples" but only provides one
- It's currently dated as an April Fool's paper

Jeremy

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:02 PM Tymi via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I have a mostly empty page for the proposal, I am trying to find time to
> build it. For now it really barely describes anything, so yeah don't be
> scared by.. its emptiness and lack of revision. You can see the preview at
> https://tymi.org/wprint if you wish!
>
> Tymi.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>