Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:13:10 -0800
Thx for the reply, Tiago.
I/O streams will be there for a long, long time, and I think retrofitting
useful features is for the benefit of the language and its users.
Seems to me that the cost of adding a manipulator is very small compared to
the feature proposed by Victor in the paper listed by Jonathan (
https://wg21.link/p1729).
I/O streams will be there for a long, long time, and I think retrofitting
useful features is for the benefit of the language and its users.
Seems to me that the cost of adding a manipulator is very small compared to
the feature proposed by Victor in the paper listed by Jonathan (
https://wg21.link/p1729).
--- On an unrelated note, since this is the first time that I post a proposal, how does the process work? Who calls the shots—e.g., if I decided to write a proposal and submit it, whose approval would it have to go through? The maintainers of this list? I would understand that this is a filter to gather input and usefulness of the proposal, but does this list have "veto" power over proposals? Thx! On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:12 AM Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]> wrote: > I’m going to be upfront. > > I may a bit biased when it comes to iostream. > > I think it is irredeemably bad, there’s nothing good about it, I hate it > to the core, and I rather see it replaced. > > And extending it, feels to very much like a wasted effort. > > > > I think is far more productive in the long run to have separate things > that deal only with formatting (and extend that) and create an independent > file or i/o interface that just does reads and writes without formatting. > > > > > > *From:* Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> *On Behalf > Of *Javier Estrada via Std-Proposals > *Sent:* Monday, February 10, 2025 7:01 PM > *To:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] > *Cc:* Javier Estrada <iphone.javier.estrada_at_[hidden]> > *Subject:* [std-proposals] std::bin manipulator for integer binary > input/output > > > > There is a manipulator gap to read/write integer numbers in binary. As you > well know, the standard manipulators are std::oct, std::dec, std::hex, > which is essentially a format flag onto ios_base::basefield. > > > > Having a dedicated manipulator would close that gap and would eliminate > the current "trick" of using std::bitset. The (abbreviated) example in > cppreference .com reads: > > > > #include <bitset> > > #include <iostream> > > > > int main() > > { > > std::cout <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/cout> << "The number 42 in octal: " << std::oct << 42 << '*\n*' > > << "The number 42 in decimal: " << std::dec << 42 << '*\n*' > > << "The number 42 in hex: " << std::hex << 42 << '*\n*'; > > > > // Note: there is no I/O manipulator that sets up a stream to print out > > // numbers in binary format (e.g. bin). If binary output is necessary > > // the std::bitset trick can be used: > > std::cout <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/cout> << "The number 42 in binary: " << std::bitset <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/bitset><8>{42} << '*\n*'; > > } > > > > With a std::bin manipulator: > > > > #include <iostream> > > #include <sstream> > > > > int main() > > { > > // This yields 101010 > std::cout <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/cout> << "The number 42 in binary: " << std:: <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/bitset>bin << 42 << '*\n*'; > > } > > > > It would also take advantage of other manipulators, like std::setw and std::setfill: > > > > #include <iostream> > > #include <sstream> > > > > int main() > > { > > // This yields *00*101010 > > std::cout <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/cout> << std::setw <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/manip/setw>(8) << std::setfill('0'); > > std::cout <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/cout> << "The number 42 in binary: " << std:: <http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/bitset>bin << 42 << '*\n*'; > > } > > > > Reading binary numbers would also be addressed by the input streams. > > > > IF this proposal is considered, I see changes in: > > - A new bin flag in ios_base::basefield. > > - Support for the flag in ios_base::setf, ios_base::unsetf and ios_base::flags member functions. > > - Creation of the manipulator (similar to other manipulators) for the different char_traits > > - Support for binary parsing for input streams > > - Support for binary output for ostreams. > > > > std::ios_base in cppreference.com: > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/ios_base > > > > Integer I/O manipulators > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/manip/hex > > > > Regards, > > —Javier > > > > > >
Received on 2025-02-11 17:13:26