If you think "different size pointers" was the issue, you clearly have not understood what we are saying.


-----Original Message-----
From: Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_lists.isocpp.org> On Behalf Of Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 2:50 PM
To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]
Cc: Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas_at_gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Make all data pointers intercompatible

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 1:21 PM Sebastian Wittmeier wrote:
>
> Whenever this pointer is converted to (void*) its address is multiplied by 8 (leftshifted by 3).
>
> If (void*) is converted back to (double*) the address is divided by 8.
>
> The roundtrip from double* to void* to double* keeps the pointer value intact.
>
> But only, if it is aligned correctly.


You have a beautiful imagination Sebastian and I reckon you'd excel in the world of theatrical entertainment. Let me know if you ever write a stage play and I'll be front row centre.

Right now this second, looking at my watch here, it's 1:44pm on Wednesday 29th January 2025, and all of the computers that had different size data pointers are all long dead. If you were to find one in an attic somewhere, you would probably need to solder out the electrolytic capacitors before applying 240v AC to it. Not even the microcontrollers nowadays have different size pointers.

Every computer alive today has pointers the same size. Continuing to accommodate dead (or imaginary) computers in the C++ standard is just needlessly complicating things.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals_at_lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals