On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:12 AM organicoman wrote:
>
> sizeof(void*) >= sizeof(char*)


The logic centres of my brain are gagging right now.

Why on earth would "void*" ever be any different than "char*"? I mean
really -- use the entirety of your imagination here to pose a
possibility to me. But a *real* *world* possibility, not some airy
fairy 1930's supercomputer that's being repurposed by Trump's Stargate
guys to hit the market in 2035 to overtake the quantum stuff.

It should be spelled out clearly in the C++26 Standard as follows:

    (1) void* has identical size and representation to char*
    (2) all data pointer types are intercompatible

And just as an aside . . . we have std::uintptr_t, so we should also
have std::uint_funcptr_t.