Sorry my mistake, twice like you said...

-----Original Message-----
From: Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 12:07 AM
To: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_gmx.net>; std-proposals_at_lists.isocpp.org; Oliver Hunt <oliver_at_apple.com>
Subject: RE: [std-proposals] Bringing break/continue with label to C++

That's incorrect.
The actual statement is:
Does WG14 wish to adopt something along the lines of n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+2-2+2

That completely changes the meaning of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]x.net>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 10:00 PM
To: std-proposals_at_lists.isocpp.org; Oliver Hunt <oliver_at_apple.com>
Cc: Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Bringing break/continue with label to C++



On 06/01/2025 21.15, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals wrote:
> I think that’s a misunderstanding, a proposal is different from it being adopted. It is not adopted. N3355 and N377 are both suggestions to change the C language, not C++, and they are still both open.

On what basis are you making that statement?


The draft minutes from the Fall WG14 meeting say:

https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3372.pdf

Celeste, Named loops, v3 n3355 (0.5 hours) [...] Straw Poll: Does WG14 want to adopt n3355 into C2y? 5+6-3+4-2+2 consensus

(WG14 N3355 apparently was discussed twice during the WG14 meeting.)

Jens