C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] New access specifiers

From: Sebastian Wittmeier <wittmeier_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:24:24 +0100
Reflection is as far as I understand on a very good way to be in C++26.   P2996 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1668 Reflection for C++26 has been forwarded after review from LEWG to LWG for inclusion in C++26     What is more interesting is, whether the code generation / metaprogramming features make it.   It seems the consensus is that it should be possible to view generated source code or at least equivalent code to it. E.g. not allowing generated code, which is more powerful language-wise by directly modifying ASTs (abstract syntax trees).   P3157 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1807 Generative Extensions for Reflection P3435 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/2099 Reflection and meta-programming P0707 https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/403 Metaclass functions for generative C++     -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:James via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> Gesendet:Mo 16.12.2024 16:41 Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] New access specifiers An:std-proposals_at_[hidden]; CC:James <james.business.84_at_[hidden]>; Sure reflection solves that, but to be fair: I don't see reflection happening for quite some time and still, I think an access

Received on 2024-12-16 16:26:30