Fair enough. But with the difference that a classical getter would be by value and that one would return a const reference. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:Robin Savonen Söderholm <robinsavonensoderholm_at_[hidden]> Gesendet:Mo 16.12.2024 13:33 Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] New access specifiers An:std-proposals_at_[hidden]; CC:Sebastian Wittmeier <wittmeier_at_[hidden]>; That would be a getter, which the OP was trying to avoid... I guess the OP would like to declare things that looks like 'member fields' but in reality are 'member functions'. Not sure how that would end up though. // Robin