On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 05:37, Jeremy Rifkin <rifkin.jer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > And it breaks users who don't even have multiple mounts
>
> I think we're in agreement on this, at least. If/when I make a second
> draft it will be with a filesystem-based definition for uniqueness. I
> realize this is closer to existing practice anyway, and I buy that the
> definition is easier to reason about and make assurances about.

And that filesystem-based definition then
A) still doesn't solve the problems of users like Gasper (which is plural)
B) breaks the users who rely on e.g. GCC's content-hashing

Still doesn't seem viable.