Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:50:23 -0700
On Thursday 29 August 2024 16:29:31 GMT-7 Jeremy Rifkin via Std-Proposals
wrote:
> In case it's not already abundantly clear: A content-based definition
> is the only way to make #pragma once work for a setup like yours with
> multiple mounts. But perhaps such a feature shouldn't bend over
> backwards to support such a case.
And what would that tell Gašper? That he should tell his company to stop doing
business because C++ no longer supports his environment? Or possibly invest
hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more) on massive infrastructure upgrades
to cache all the files locally without having to have FUSE?
As I said in the other email, #pragma once transfers the problem from the
author of the code to the user of the code.
wrote:
> In case it's not already abundantly clear: A content-based definition
> is the only way to make #pragma once work for a setup like yours with
> multiple mounts. But perhaps such a feature shouldn't bend over
> backwards to support such a case.
And what would that tell Gašper? That he should tell his company to stop doing
business because C++ no longer supports his environment? Or possibly invest
hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more) on massive infrastructure upgrades
to cache all the files locally without having to have FUSE?
As I said in the other email, #pragma once transfers the problem from the
author of the code to the user of the code.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering
Received on 2024-08-30 01:50:27