Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:53:56 +1000
* In my estimation `unless` is claimable as a full keyword:
unless (is_pickle())
put_in_sandwidch();
(There is existing practice in another language, can't remember which one.)
** It's hard to believe, but: `if (!expr)` occurs once in every 60 lines of
C++ code, or about 5 times per source file.*
That's pretty amazing, I would never have guessed that.
* You are correct that `while(!expr)` is much rarer. Only 1 in every 5000
lines or so.
* You are also correct that `operator!` overloading is almost non-existent.
-Andrew
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:34 AM Yexuan Xiao via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Firstly, I believe that this particular case in if statements is the most
> common, so it’s my main focus; secondly, the ‘if not’ construct already
> exists and is widely used elsewhere, making it more readily acceptable.
> Therefore, the proposal will focus exclusively on if statements rather than
> loop statements.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf
> of Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 21, 2024 1:18
> *To:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Sebastian Wittmeier <wittmeier_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] if !(condition)
>
>
> I would expect a comment about "while" and "do while" (and possibly "for").
>
>
>
> Would you propose adding ! there, too, oppose it, leave it neutrally open,
> invite anybody to write a paper or want to see, how if !() works out? Or is
> it not possible there?
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> *Von:* Yexuan Xiao via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Gesendet:* Sa 20.04.2024 18:09
> *Betreff:* [std-proposals] if !(condition)
> *An:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]>;
> *CC:* Yexuan Xiao <bizwen_at_[hidden]>;
> I've wrote a proposal that suggests allowing the omission of the outermost
> parentheses to simplify the conditions in if statements:
> https://storage.nykz.org/proposals/if-not/
>
> Please share your comments.
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
unless (is_pickle())
put_in_sandwidch();
(There is existing practice in another language, can't remember which one.)
** It's hard to believe, but: `if (!expr)` occurs once in every 60 lines of
C++ code, or about 5 times per source file.*
That's pretty amazing, I would never have guessed that.
* You are correct that `while(!expr)` is much rarer. Only 1 in every 5000
lines or so.
* You are also correct that `operator!` overloading is almost non-existent.
-Andrew
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:34 AM Yexuan Xiao via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Firstly, I believe that this particular case in if statements is the most
> common, so it’s my main focus; secondly, the ‘if not’ construct already
> exists and is widely used elsewhere, making it more readily acceptable.
> Therefore, the proposal will focus exclusively on if statements rather than
> loop statements.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf
> of Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 21, 2024 1:18
> *To:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Sebastian Wittmeier <wittmeier_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] if !(condition)
>
>
> I would expect a comment about "while" and "do while" (and possibly "for").
>
>
>
> Would you propose adding ! there, too, oppose it, leave it neutrally open,
> invite anybody to write a paper or want to see, how if !() works out? Or is
> it not possible there?
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> *Von:* Yexuan Xiao via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Gesendet:* Sa 20.04.2024 18:09
> *Betreff:* [std-proposals] if !(condition)
> *An:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]>;
> *CC:* Yexuan Xiao <bizwen_at_[hidden]>;
> I've wrote a proposal that suggests allowing the omission of the outermost
> parentheses to simplify the conditions in if statements:
> https://storage.nykz.org/proposals/if-not/
>
> Please share your comments.
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
Received on 2024-04-20 19:54:08