Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:13:12 -0700
On Wednesday 17 April 2024 04:16:00 GMT-7 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-
Proposals wrote:
> There are two possible papers to submit:
>
> (1) Add functionality to std::any to get a base class
>
> (2) Add functionality to std::any to get a base class without
> causing an ABI break
It's the same paper.
I believe we've already concluded there's no ABI break necessary and the
vendor is the ultimate authority anyway.
Proposals wrote:
> There are two possible papers to submit:
>
> (1) Add functionality to std::any to get a base class
>
> (2) Add functionality to std::any to get a base class without
> causing an ABI break
It's the same paper.
I believe we've already concluded there's no ABI break necessary and the
vendor is the ultimate authority anyway.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
Received on 2024-04-17 15:13:17