I'm sure I speak for the reflection folks in saying that they would welcome
whatever suggestions you may have for improvements. Maybe pose your
proposal to them as a recommended delta on P2996. -Andrew

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Aurelien Cassagnes <
aurelien.cassagnes_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Took another read at it and didn't find reference to this being supported.
> I ll flesh out the proposal some more and have it discussed with the
> reflection SG7
>
> Le dim. 14 avr. 2024 à 16:55, Andrew Tomazos via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:30 PM Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <
>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 13 April 2024 18:33:16 GMT-7 Aurelien Cassagnes via
>>> Std-Proposals
>>> wrote:
>>> > Other examples of wrapping around callables can be found, whether by
>>> > closure or explicity registering callbacks for dispatch, etc.
>>> > The proposal here is to introduce a `declattr` keyword to look into
>>> > attributes bound to an entity, the form would be likely equivalent to
>>> how
>>> > `decltype` or `declval` are used.
>>>
>>> This is probably already taken into account in reflection. If it's not,
>>> it
>>> should be. So can you contact the relevant SG and see if it's there?
>>> reflexpr
>>> and other reflection papers are out there too.
>>>
>>
>> The latest reflection paper is wg21.link/p2996
>>
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>