Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:13:34 -0700
On Sunday, 31 March 2024 09:09:43 PDT Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals wrote:
> 1. It can expand the underlying buffer. In which case contents aren’t
> moved and no references are invalidated in practice.
That's really hard to do. We've been asking for a "realloc_no_move" or
something equivalent for 15 years. That is, resize the underlying buffer if
possible, but don't move the data if not.
> 1. It can expand the underlying buffer. In which case contents aren’t
> moved and no references are invalidated in practice.
That's really hard to do. We've been asking for a "realloc_no_move" or
something equivalent for 15 years. That is, resize the underlying buffer if
possible, but don't move the data if not.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
Received on 2024-03-31 16:13:36