Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 20:56:24 +0100
On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 20:43, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Because either it wasn't available with GCC 9, _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0
> or the simple fact atomic operations still doesn't fix the defective
> reset() call.
>
So what are you advising the committee to do about that?
>
> I can't remember exactly.
>
Useful, thanks.
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Because either it wasn't available with GCC 9, _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0
> or the simple fact atomic operations still doesn't fix the defective
> reset() call.
>
So what are you advising the committee to do about that?
>
> I can't remember exactly.
>
Useful, thanks.
Received on 2023-05-25 19:56:38