Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:15:04 +0300
On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 12:14, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 12:04, sasho648 via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Which means - introducing `constexpr goto` from the beginning and now instead of guessing what an implementation may be required to do to allow it - just looking at existing implementations that have allowed it.
>
> None of them have allowed it, and three out of for major
Three out of four, cursed typo.
<ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 12:04, sasho648 via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Which means - introducing `constexpr goto` from the beginning and now instead of guessing what an implementation may be required to do to allow it - just looking at existing implementations that have allowed it.
>
> None of them have allowed it, and three out of for major
Three out of four, cursed typo.
Received on 2023-05-25 09:15:18