Hi,

On 24 May 2023 14:07:28 BST, Federico Kircheis via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:02:56PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Std-Proposals wrote:
>> On 5/24/23 14:57, LUCE Jean-Sébastien via Std-Proposals wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> It is often useful to support multiple cancel conditions, like 'return' in
>>> a function, but without having to isolate the code in such a function
>>> (which is called from a single point).
>>>
>>> I'm used to write code like
>>>
>>> "
>>> do {
>>> if (Failed(Condition0))
>>> break;
>>> if (Failed(Condition1))
>>> break;
>>> Code_to_execute;
>>> } while (0);
>>> "
>>
>> The keyword exists, with a lovely name: goto
>>
>> ```c
>> if (failed(foo))
>> goto x;
>> if (failed(bar))
>> goto x;
>>
>> baz();
>> x:
>> ```
>>
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
>Unfortunately it cannot be used in constexpr functions, maybe it is a good time to lift that restriction...

Absolutely agree, I just bumped into this. I went with the do {... break; ...} while(false) workaround.

Is this hard to implement?

Cheers,
Lénárd