Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:38:15 -0400
On 3/27/23 13:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 27 March 2023 12:32:45 EDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> I could easily figure it out with Clang's memory sanitizer in Linux but
>> under Windows we can't compile CUDA using Clang.
>
> Complain to your CUDA vendor. That has nothing to do with the C++ standard: if
> you're using a piece software that you can't modify to your wishes, modifying
> the C++ standard is not the solution to the problem.
I duly noted that the C++ committee is not interested to integrate this
into the standards.
That doesn't mean I agree given the standards can make use of some major
revamp instead of the never ending minor syntax changes here and there.
I also proactively think it's pretty obvious that C++ will need to adapt
sooner or later to load balanced algorithms using different types of
parallel processors and memory.
When I think about it the new virtual table-based memory allocator could
not only be sped up using fast thread-local FIFO memory pages I've
previously shown (3.6x) but also adding the ability to use CPU or GPU
memory pages could also be a great asset.
>> Last time I talked to them they embraced and extended my PowerCalc into
>> their MS Power Toys, so I'd rather do it the correct way from now on.
>
> Since the correct way is to have Microsoft fix Microsoft bugs, I don't see your
> reticence here.
I was making a true statement but sarcastic joke at the same time.
Please forget it.
> On Monday, 27 March 2023 12:32:45 EDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> I could easily figure it out with Clang's memory sanitizer in Linux but
>> under Windows we can't compile CUDA using Clang.
>
> Complain to your CUDA vendor. That has nothing to do with the C++ standard: if
> you're using a piece software that you can't modify to your wishes, modifying
> the C++ standard is not the solution to the problem.
I duly noted that the C++ committee is not interested to integrate this
into the standards.
That doesn't mean I agree given the standards can make use of some major
revamp instead of the never ending minor syntax changes here and there.
I also proactively think it's pretty obvious that C++ will need to adapt
sooner or later to load balanced algorithms using different types of
parallel processors and memory.
When I think about it the new virtual table-based memory allocator could
not only be sped up using fast thread-local FIFO memory pages I've
previously shown (3.6x) but also adding the ability to use CPU or GPU
memory pages could also be a great asset.
>> Last time I talked to them they embraced and extended my PowerCalc into
>> their MS Power Toys, so I'd rather do it the correct way from now on.
>
> Since the correct way is to have Microsoft fix Microsoft bugs, I don't see your
> reticence here.
I was making a true statement but sarcastic joke at the same time.
Please forget it.
-- Logo <https://www.fornux.com/> *Phil Bouchard* facebook icon <https://www.linkedin.com/in/phil-bouchard-5723a910/> CTO T: (819) 328-4743 E: phil_at_[hidden]| www.fornux.com <http://www.fornux.com> 8 rue de la Baie| Gatineau (Qc), J8T 3H3 Canada Banner <https://goglobalawards.org/> Le message ci-dessus, ainsi que les documents l'accompagnant, sont destinés uniquement aux personnes identifiées et peuvent contenir des informations privilégiées, confidentielles ou ne pouvant être divulguées. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez le détruire. This communication (and/or the attachments) is intended for named recipients only and may contain privileged or confidential information which is not to be disclosed. If you received this communication by mistake please destroy all copies.
Received on 2023-03-29 02:38:17