On Wed, 1 Mar 2023, 20:48 Ray Gardener via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Not gonna lie, if I see code exploiting integer overflow, I reject it. It
> just smells hoity-toity. I like code to be dead obvious.
>
> And as for assigning negative numbers to unsigned types, whatever happened
> to type safety?
>

Would you prefer -1zu then? That's a literal of type size_t so there's no
negative number and no question of it being not "type safe". It means
exactly the same thing though.