Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:59:47 +0200
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 14:44, Jarrad Waterloo via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Not to be dense, does that mean the following is slated for 23 or 26?
>
> scope_exit
> scope_fail
> scope_success
> unique_resource
Right now they're not being slated for either, because we don't (yet)
have the proposal to move any of them
into C++26. They certainly missed the train for C++23.
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Not to be dense, does that mean the following is slated for 23 or 26?
>
> scope_exit
> scope_fail
> scope_success
> unique_resource
Right now they're not being slated for either, because we don't (yet)
have the proposal to move any of them
into C++26. They certainly missed the train for C++23.
Received on 2022-12-12 15:00:00