> I also propose that the variable "record" would be inaccessible by
> other methods.

How is this different from a local variable in member function "Method"?

Il giorno sab 15 ott 2022 alle ore 21:50 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> ha scritto:

> I propose that the following:
>
> struct Foo {
>
> int Method(int arg)
> {
> int Foo::record;
>
> record = arg;
>
> return arg + 4u;
> }
> };
>
> behaves the same as:
>
> struct Foo {
>
> int record;
>
> int Method(int arg)
> {
> record = arg;
>
> return arg + 4u;
> }
> };
>
> There are times when a method needs a simple variable such as a
> counter or a boolean, and so we then need to add a member variable to
> the class definition. I'm proposing that we can do all of this inside
> the body of the method -- so long as the body of the method is inline
> inside the class definition. I also propose that the variable "record"
> would be inaccessible by other methods.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>