Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:35:25 +1000
Ah.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:48 PM Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:05 AM Zopolis0 via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > I misread some of it, but does this part not help?
> > (i.e. being able to call export namespace {} without wrapping the file
> in it)
> >
> > export namespace {} // error: does not introduce any
> namesnamespace has internal linkage
>
> In the new proposal, that's clearly an error. It crossed out the
> reason "does not introduce any names", but it provides a new reason:
> unnamed namespaces having internal linkage.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:48 PM Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:05 AM Zopolis0 via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > I misread some of it, but does this part not help?
> > (i.e. being able to call export namespace {} without wrapping the file
> in it)
> >
> > export namespace {} // error: does not introduce any
> namesnamespace has internal linkage
>
> In the new proposal, that's clearly an error. It crossed out the
> reason "does not introduce any names", but it provides a new reason:
> unnamed namespaces having internal linkage.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
Received on 2022-09-07 07:35:39