C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] Any plans to standardize parallel_for?

From: Drew Gross <drew.a.gross_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:29:45 -0700
This was standardized in C++17, see the 2nd overload of std::for_each:

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 3:06 PM Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Greetings,
> I wrote a tool to process ~ 500 galaxy rotation curves for my theory in
> astrophysics (Finite Theory) in Python and C++:
> https://github.com/philippeb8/grc/blob/main/src/main.cpp
> I'm not sure why Python is so popular given it's a trillion times slower
> than C++.
> Anyway my point is parallel_for that I'm using is by far very essential to
> speed up these types of algorithms. I remember back at university we were
> using a language called Parallaxis for parallel processing. Functions like
> parallel_for can definitely fill in this gap.
> So I was just wondering if there are any plans to parallelize C++?
> Regards,
> --
> [image: Logo] <https://www.fornux.com/>
> *Phil Bouchard* [image: facebook icon]
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/phil-bouchard-5723a910/>
> T: (819) 328-4743
> E: phil_at_[hidden] | www.fornux.com
> 1188 rue Saint-Louis | Gatineau (Qc), J8T 2L8 Canada
> [image: Banner] <https://goglobalawards.org/> Le message ci-dessus, ainsi
> que les documents l'accompagnant, sont destinés uniquement aux personnes
> identifiées et peuvent contenir des informations privilégiées,
> confidentielles ou ne pouvant être divulguées. Si vous avez reçu ce message
> par erreur, veuillez le détruire.
> This communication (and/or the attachments) is intended for named
> recipients only and may contain privileged or confidential information
> which is not to be disclosed. If you received this communication by mistake
> please destroy all copies.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

Received on 2022-08-18 22:29:57