C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] Contradiction about this parameter in the C++ standard

From: language.lawyer_at <language.lawyer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 05:22:01 +0300
On 18/04/2022 23:23, Edward Catmur wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 21:13, <language.lawyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On 18/04/2022 22:57, Edward Catmur wrote:
>>> I suppose that paragraph <https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.call#7.sentence-4>
>> (and
>>> the following Note) should be struck entirely.
>> I'd say then we will not know which object [expr.prim.this]/1 speaks about
>> (Ā«The keyword `this` names a pointer to the object for which an implicit
>> object member function is invokedĀ»)
>>
>
> "the object for which an implicit object member function is invoked" seems
> clear enough; per [expr.call]/2 it's the object expression on the LHS of
> the postfix expression (before the '.', '->', '.*' or '->*').

If it is a base-class function, the object is the corresponding base class subobject, isn't it?

Received on 2022-04-19 02:22:06