Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 12:01:47 +0100
On 06/03/2022 02:19, Arthur O'Dwyer via Std-Proposals wrote:
> I'm familiar with https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto
> <https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto> , but still, you're going to have an
> uphill battle explaining why "tau_v" would be a better name than "twopi_v".
Note that if one does a mental mapping of
* pi_v = M_PI, hence
* twopi_v = M_2_PI
this will backfire -- M_2_PI is 2/pi, not 2*pi.
My 2 c,
> I'm familiar with https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto
> <https://tauday.com/tau-manifesto> , but still, you're going to have an
> uphill battle explaining why "tau_v" would be a better name than "twopi_v".
Note that if one does a mental mapping of
* pi_v = M_PI, hence
* twopi_v = M_2_PI
this will backfire -- M_2_PI is 2/pi, not 2*pi.
My 2 c,
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo
Received on 2022-03-06 11:01:54