C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: Slim mutexes and locks based on C++20 std::atomic::wait

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:11:48 +0300
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 23:03, Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Even more off-topic: How would you envision support for transactional
> > memory in C++ in general? Should there be an option to map a memory
> > transaction abort into an exception?
>
> Wasn't there a study group on this?

See
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p1875r2.pdf
and
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2066r9.html

The're about to publish a new TS.

Received on 2021-09-28 17:12:02