Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:05:02 -0300
>
> And formally (
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0931r0.pdf)
> which was rejected in Jacksonville, 5-11.
>
>
It says in the link
can-the-structured-bindings-syntax-be-used-in-polymorphic-lambdas
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45541334/can-the-structured-bindings-syntax-be-used-in-polymorphic-lambdas>
that
it was rejected because of ambiguity against array parameters, anybody know
if it is the only problem ?
Thank you
Cleiton
> And formally (
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p0931r0.pdf)
> which was rejected in Jacksonville, 5-11.
>
>
It says in the link
can-the-structured-bindings-syntax-be-used-in-polymorphic-lambdas
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45541334/can-the-structured-bindings-syntax-be-used-in-polymorphic-lambdas>
that
it was rejected because of ambiguity against array parameters, anybody know
if it is the only problem ?
Thank you
Cleiton
Received on 2021-09-08 21:05:20