Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 15:55:40 -0400
On 8/6/21 12:31 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
> 1)
>
> "GPLv3 specifically states that you must grant all downstream
> recipients of a covered work an irrevocable, royalty free license to
> the patented component, or you can't distribute the software."
>
> So Linus, the Gnu GCC and maybe Clang communities should be happy then.
>
>
> 2)
>
> The ISO C++ committee can still add the framework I suggested after
> I've loosened the restrictions of the patent.
>
>
> 3)
>
> Commercial usages or transitions to other languages can be negotiated.
>
Again if people worry about my "values", I can say all my efforts are
directed on research and development in:
- astrophysics (already in touch with the ISS + muons experiment will
prove the standard model wrong within a year);
- artificial intelligence (deep learning, GPU programming, artificial
super intelligence, ...).
Where both are inevitable anyways.
>
> 1)
>
> "GPLv3 specifically states that you must grant all downstream
> recipients of a covered work an irrevocable, royalty free license to
> the patented component, or you can't distribute the software."
>
> So Linus, the Gnu GCC and maybe Clang communities should be happy then.
>
>
> 2)
>
> The ISO C++ committee can still add the framework I suggested after
> I've loosened the restrictions of the patent.
>
>
> 3)
>
> Commercial usages or transitions to other languages can be negotiated.
>
Again if people worry about my "values", I can say all my efforts are
directed on research and development in:
- astrophysics (already in touch with the ISS + muons experiment will
prove the standard model wrong within a year);
- artificial intelligence (deep learning, GPU programming, artificial
super intelligence, ...).
Where both are inevitable anyways.
-- *Phil Bouchard* Founder & CTO C.: (819) 328-4743 Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
Received on 2021-08-06 14:55:46