Sorry, but who do you expect to get involved in a C++ language extensions
encumbered by patents? Does your "C++ Superset" allow a patent-free,
open-source implementation?

If you're looking for customers for a new commercial product, or
employees/consultants to work on such a commercial product, I don't think
this is the appropriate forum to advertise.

I hope that I simply misunderstood you, and that you're not seriously
asking for volunteers to get involved in patent-encumbered C++ language
extensions.

Cheers,
Emile Cormier

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 9:02 PM <std-proposals-request_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:13:40 -0400
> From: Phil Bouchard <boost_at_[hidden]>
> To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [std-proposals] SCC / ISO IEC - C++ Superset
> Message-ID: <7cedfba6-93d2-fdbd-19f0-c8f66a574d8b_at_[hidden]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Greetings,
>
> I wanted to wait to announce that but since the subject is opened then
> just know that I am planning to create an ISO / IEC JTC 1 framework on
> top of C++ called C++ Superset (that can be integrated into the C++
> later on). You won't have to worry about bad and inefficient memory
> management anymore. All you'll have to do is to run the compiler on
> existing C / C++ code and your app will be crash proof and free from
> memory leaks.
>
> That framework will offer the ability to add implicit variables,
> parameters, compound statement instances, class members and global
> singletons to existing C / C++ code and to overload raw pointers to the
> user's convenience. The Root Pointer I wrote is patent pending but any
> other important functionality can be added such as a runtime stack
> trace, catching segmentation faults before they emit a SIGSEGV, buffer
> overflows, double frees, ... the most important problems so far.
>
> More than 10 years ago I was part of the Boost community and I wanted to
> create my own language but they told me not to create yet another
> language so I decided to create C++ Superset which makes sense because
> existing libraries just have to be recompiled, not rewritten from scratch.
>
> So I was hoping to create my own SCC / ISO mailing list before
> announcing it but again since the subject was brought up already then
> now you know. I would like to recruit interested people as well.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> *Phil Bouchard*
> Founder & CTO
> C.: (819) 328-4743
>
> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>